Perspective

Catching a Rocket With Chopsticks

By Kyle Harrison

Updated

October 19, 2024

Reading Time

4 min

SpaceX turned science fiction into science fact last week after the rocket manufacturer successfully launched its 397-foot Starship spacecraft into the atmosphere, and, seven minutes later, caught the rocket’s Super Heavy booster with “chopsticks” on its launch tower.

The difficulty of this feat can’t be overstated: SpaceX caught an 11 million pound, 226-foot-tall tower that was hurtling out of the sky with a pair of “chopsticks”. Two days after the launch Musk said early in 2025, the company hoped to “catch the ship too,” referring to the Starship spacecraft itself. Successfully catching the Super Heavy rocket was a huge step toward SpaceX’s ambitions of flying humans to the Moon, Mars, and even from city to city on Earth — the company claims it could fly passengers from London to New York on its Starship in 29 minutes.

The reason why it was so important? The ability to reuse its rockets allows SpaceX to lower launch costs.

One of the biggest hurdles to expanding space travel has long been cost. Payload Space estimates that the Starship costs $90 million to manufacture, including $1 million for each of its 39 Raptor engines. Single-use rockets would make space travel too expensive for all but the wealthiest parties, such as billionaires and governments, but reusable rockets have allowed SpaceX to lower its prices, making space travel a viable opportunity.

While SpaceX hopes that Starship will eventually lead missions to the Moon and Mars, the company has already both saved and disrupted the US space industry with the success of its Falcon rockets.

At the turn of the 21st century, space exploration was on its deathbed. In 1966, three years before Neil Armstrong took “one small step for man,” NASA’s budget was $5.9 billion ($55.7 billion in 2023 dollars), or 4.41% of the entire federal budget.

By 2001, that number had declined to just 0.76% of the federal budget or $24.2 billion in 2023 dollars. This budget decline was accompanied by a decline in launches into space: In 1969, America launched 62 objects into space. In 2001, that number was just 34.

One reason for this, as Musk realized before founding SpaceX in 2002, was that launch costs for single-use rockets were too expensive. The price per pound to take a payload to low Earth orbit on one of NASA’s shuttles (which were retired in 2011) was $30K in 2021 dollars. After failing to secure a rocket from Russia in 2001, Musk set out to build his own reusable rockets from scratch, starting with the Falcon 1.

Designed to be a low-cost alternative to satellite launch vehicles from public companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing, the Falcon 1 became the first privately funded and developed launch vehicle to go into orbit when it carried a dummy payload into low Earth orbit in 2008.

Following the retirement of the partly recoverable Falcon 1 in 2009, SpaceX focused on improved reusability in its next model, the Falcon 9. Ultimately, the company succeeded, with the Falcon 9 rocket boasting a two-stage design with a fully reusable first stage that decreased launch prices to as low as $1.2K per pound in 2022 – an almost 30x reduction.

These cost reductions have coincided with a SpaceX-driven space renaissance over the last 20 years. In 2003, the US sent just 28 objects into space (out of 88 total around the world). In 2023, the US launched 2,166 objects into space – more than the rest of the world combined. Now, SpaceX hopes to build on this momentum with its Starship by accelerating the number of people that the US sends to space.

If you want to read more about SpaceX’s founding story, cosmic ambitions, product evolution, and market opportunities, read our full memo on the company here.

Important Disclosures

This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and Contrary LLC (Contrary LLC, together with its affiliates, “Contrary”) makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.

The information herein is based on Contrary beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to Contrary on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance of a company is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.

Contrary shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that Contrary has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.

Contrary is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Contrary in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed Contrary. Investment decisions for Contrary clients are made by Contrary. Please note that, although Contrary manages assets on behalf of Contrary clients, Contrary clients may take any position (whether positive or negative) with respect to the company described in this material. The information provided in this material does not represent any investment strategy that Contrary manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.

Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, company or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security of the company discussed in this presentation.

Please see www.contrary.com/legal for additional important information.

Authors

Kyle Harrison

General Partner @ Contrary

Kyle leads Contrary’s investing efforts for companies from seed to scale. He’s previously worked at firms like Index and Coatue investing in companies like Databricks, Snowflake, Snyk, Plaid, Toast, and Persona.

See articles

© 2026 Contrary Research · All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

By navigating this website you agree to our privacy policy.