Contrary ResearchContrary Research
Contrary ResearchContrary Research
CompaniesReportsTopicsAbout
Subscribe
Report/
Contrary ResearchContrary Research

Powered by

Contrary

Discover

  • Companies
  • Reports
  • Topics
  • About

Connect

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Subscribe

Powered by

Contrary

© 2026 Contrary Research · All rights reserved

|Privacy Policy
Report/
Perspective
Clean Energy

Another Advanced Reactor Goes Critical

June 20, 2026|2 min

A perspective from Contrary Research.

Dot-grid bar chart: level grey bars, the last topped by a tall blue segment
  • Perspective
  • Authors1
  • Related Companies2

On Thursday, Valar Atomics announced that it had taken its Ward 250 reactor critical. In doing so, it became the second advanced reactor to do so under the DOE’s Reactor Pilot Program (the other being Antares Nuclear’s Mark-0), and the first DOE-authorized reactor built and operated outside the national laboratory system. As Valar put it, the reactor went critical as a complete, fully integrated system configured for power operations and has now begun non-commercial power ascension. Founder and CEO Isaiah Taylor noted that Ward 250 is Valar’s second criticality as a company, following the NOVA core’s zero-power criticality at Los Alamos in November 2025. The company still has its eye on a harder target: power operations by July 4, the deadline set by President Trump’s executive order for at least three advanced reactors to achieve criticality.

This is the second major milestone in nuclear this month. As we wrote a few weeks ago about Antares, the persistent knock on advanced reactor startups has been a pattern of missed deadlines, and the value of these milestones lies as much in proving execution as in the underlying physics. Two more contenders remain in the running for the July 4 deadline: Aalo Atomics and Oklo’s Atomic Alchemy subsidiary, both still working through DOE authorization reviews. With two of the three required reactors now critical within six months, the challenge now shifts from proving feasibility to generating electricity at scale.

Authors

  • Sachin Maini

    Senior Editor

    See articles

Important Disclosures

This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and Contrary LLC (Contrary LLC, together with its affiliates, “Contrary”) makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.

The information herein is based on Contrary beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to Contrary on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance of a company is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.

Contrary shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that Contrary has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.

Contrary is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Contrary in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed Contrary. Investment decisions for Contrary clients are made by Contrary. Please note that, although Contrary manages assets on behalf of Contrary clients, Contrary clients may take any position (whether positive or negative) with respect to the company described in this material. The information provided in this material does not represent any investment strategy that Contrary manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.

Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, company or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security of the company discussed in this presentation.

Please see www.contrary.com/legal for additional important information.

Authors

  • Sachin Maini

    Senior Editor

    Sachin Maini is Senior Editor of Contrary Research, where he's led the publication of 500+ company-specific reports and dozens of industry deep dives. Prior to Contrary, Sachin led content for NFX, publishing several seminal essays on network effects for the firm.

    See articles

Related Companies

All companies
  • Valar Atomics logo
    Clean EnergySeries A
    Clean EnergySeries A

    Valar Atomics

    Valar Atomics, a nuclear energy startup founded by Isaiah Taylor, is taking a novel approach to nuclear power. Rather than fighting the limitations of the electrical grid, Valar has identified a fundamental mismatch between nuclear capabilities and electricity as a product. "Electricity is a terrible product," Taylor argues, because it can't be easily transported through space or time. It must be used immediately and requires fixed infrastructure to deliver. This realization led to Valar's core innovation: using nuclear reactors not to generate electricity, but to produce synthetic hydrocarbon fuels that plug directly into our existing energy infrastructure.

    1 PerspectiveMemo
  • Radiant logo
    Clean EnergySeries C
    Clean EnergySeries C

    Radiant

    Radiant builds portable nuclear microreactors that are intended to replace diesel generators in “remote villages” and to provide “resilient backup power for hospitals, data centers, and military installations.

    1 PerspectiveMemo

Subscribe to the Research Rundown

Subscribe for a weekly digest on the best private technology companies.