Perspective

AI's Energy Appetite

By Kyle Harrison

Tags

Updated

August 31, 2024

Reading Time

3 min

As artificial intelligence revolutionizes industries worldwide, it brings with it a surge in energy consumption. This growing demand for power, particularly in data centers that form the backbone of AI operations, raises critical questions about the sustainability of AI's rapid expansion and the future of energy production required to support it.

AI models, especially large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and GPT-4, are notoriously energy-intensive. The training phase alone for GPT-3 consumed an estimated 1,287 MWh—equivalent to the annual energy usage of 100 U.S. households. However, the energy requirements extend beyond training. The inference phase, where models process real-time queries, accumulates even greater energy consumption over time.

The energy disparity between AI-powered and traditional search queries is stark. A single ChatGPT query consumes approximately ten times more energy than a Google search. If Google's daily search volume were to be powered by ChatGPT, or a similar AI, it would require about 9 terawatt-hours annually—roughly 4% of the total energy consumption of all U.S. data centers.

In a recent appearance on Patrick O'Shaughnessy's "Invest Like the Best" podcast, Gavin Baker — managing partner and CIO of Atreides Management — discussed a wide range of topics that are shaping the future of AI. He mentions the escalating energy consumption of AI systems and the pressing need for improved efficiency in data center infrastructure due do the the mismatch between GPU capabilities and supporting technologies.

While GPUs — the workhorses of AI computations — have seen dramatic speed improvements, other crucial components like networking, storage, and memory lag behind. This disparity results in inefficient GPU utilization, with powerful processors often idling while waiting for data.

Baker emphasizes the need for advanced networking to ensure faster data transfer to GPUs, enhanced storage solutions for quicker data retrieval and processing, and improved memory technologies to keep pace with GPU processing speeds. Additionally, optimizing Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) is crucial for managing electricity costs in data centers. Baker warns that without significant advancements in these areas, the energy demands of AI could potentially outstrip available power resources, leading to a scenario where data centers consume an unsustainable portion of global electricity.

Tech giants are exploring innovative power solutions to meet AI's growing energy needs. Google's partnership with Fervo to use geothermal energy for its Nevada data centers exemplifies the industry's push towards sustainable energy sources. The development of more energy-efficient AI models, such as OpenAI's GPT-4 Turbo, represents another approach to mitigating AI's energy impact. These models aim to deliver equivalent performance at lower energy costs.

Meeting the energy demands of AI will require a multi-faceted approach. Continued innovation in energy-efficient technologies, both in AI models and data center infrastructure, is essential. Expanding and diversifying sustainable power generation sources will play a crucial role. Optimizing data center design with a focus on efficiency and sustainable practices is equally important. Policy and industry collaboration will also be necessary to ensure responsible AI development and deployment.

The future of AI hinges not just on computational power, but on the ability to power it sustainably. This challenge presents an opportunity to revolutionize our approach to energy production and consumption, potentially leading to breakthroughs that benefit not only the tech industry but society as a whole.

Important Disclosures

This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and Contrary LLC (Contrary LLC, together with its affiliates, “Contrary”) makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.

The information herein is based on Contrary beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to Contrary on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance of a company is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.

Contrary shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that Contrary has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.

Contrary is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Contrary in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed Contrary. Investment decisions for Contrary clients are made by Contrary. Please note that, although Contrary manages assets on behalf of Contrary clients, Contrary clients may take any position (whether positive or negative) with respect to the company described in this material. The information provided in this material does not represent any investment strategy that Contrary manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.

Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, company or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security of the company discussed in this presentation.

Please see www.contrary.com/legal for additional important information.

Authors

Kyle Harrison

General Partner @ Contrary

Kyle leads Contrary’s investing efforts for companies from seed to scale. He’s previously worked at firms like Index and Coatue investing in companies like Databricks, Snowflake, Snyk, Plaid, Toast, and Persona.

See articles

© 2026 Contrary Research · All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

By navigating this website you agree to our privacy policy.