Perspective

Washington Turns Off the Tap to Chinese Tech

By Kyle Harrison

Updated

February 25, 2023

Reading Time

3 min

Due to geopolitical tensions, US multinational firms are more cautious about investing in China. S&P Global Market Intelligence data revealed that in 2022, US capital investments in China declined 76% YoY to $7.02 billion from $28.92 billion, and deals dropped 40%. Additionally, US dollar investments in Chinese startups decreased by almost 75% YoY - only 19% of the capital was in USD compared to 39% in 2021.

The White House has been working on a measure to limit U.S. venture capital firms from pouring money into Chinese companies in high-tech areas that could threaten national security, like artificial intelligence and quantum computing. Congress is preparing to propose its plans to restrict US firms from investing in sensitive Chinese tech companies. There’s a bipartisan appetite for policies that look tough on China, which means that legislation restricting outbound investment might have a chance of passing, despite a divided Congress. The US government has been increasingly scrutinizing foreign investments, American investments in other countries, and reliance on China, bringing attention to its domestic capacity of high-tech manufacturing of critical goods like semiconductors.

Since American researchers invented the integrated circuit in the late 1950s, the U.S. manufacturing share has dwindled. Most American chip companies focus on designing cutting-edge products while outsourcing the costly manufacturing to overseas foundries. Semiconductor suppliers and their customers pulled together last year to lobby the Congress to help shore up U.S. chip manufacturing and reduce vulnerabilities in the crucial supply chain. The push led lawmakers to approve the CHIPS Act, including $52 billion in subsidies to companies and research institutions as well as $24 billion or more in tax credits — one of the biggest infusions into a single industry in decades.

In August, Biden’s CHIPS and Science Act injected $52 billion to support US chip production. As of September 2022, the Semiconductor Industry Association reported 277,000 workers in the US semiconductor industry but had a 0% global share of leading-edge semiconductors. Taiwan and South Korea make up 80% of the global foundry market for chip production. Global VC investments in semiconductor startups have declined from 2021 high of $14.5 billion to $7.8 billion as of December 5, 2022, according to PitchBook. To learn more about the evolution of chips, you can read our overview here.

Venture-backed startups like Cerebras Systems and SambaNova are leading the charge in innovation outside public incumbents like Qualcomm, AMD, and Nvidia. Intel acquired venture-backed Nervana Systems for $350 million in 2016 for deep learning training chips, which was then dominated by Nvidia. Cisco bought venture-backed semiconductor company Luxtera for $660 million in 2018. While the funding has fallen, there is renewed enthusiasm for semiconductors in the US ecosystem, given the pandemic-fueled shortages, increased government support, recent developments in artificial intelligence, and changing geo-political climate.

Important Disclosures

This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and Contrary LLC (Contrary LLC, together with its affiliates, “Contrary”) makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.

The information herein is based on Contrary beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to Contrary on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance of a company is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.

Contrary shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that Contrary has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.

Contrary is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Contrary in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed Contrary. Investment decisions for Contrary clients are made by Contrary. Please note that, although Contrary manages assets on behalf of Contrary clients, Contrary clients may take any position (whether positive or negative) with respect to the company described in this material. The information provided in this material does not represent any investment strategy that Contrary manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.

Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, company or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security of the company discussed in this presentation.

Please see www.contrary.com/legal for additional important information.

Authors

Kyle Harrison

General Partner @ Contrary

Kyle leads Contrary’s investing efforts for companies from seed to scale. He’s previously worked at firms like Index and Coatue investing in companies like Databricks, Snowflake, Snyk, Plaid, Toast, and Persona.

See articles

© 2026 Contrary Research · All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

By navigating this website you agree to our privacy policy.